Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] pstore/ram: Register context with minidump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 2/24/2023 1:13 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:55:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
There are system which does not uses pstore directly but
may have the interest in the context saved by pstore.
Register pstore regions with minidump so that it get
dumped on minidump collection.

Okay, so, this is a really interesting case -- it's a RAM backend that
is already found on a system by pstore via device tree, but there is
_another_ RAM overlay (minidump) that would like to know more about how
the pstore ram backend carves up the memory regions so it can examine
them itself too. (i.e. it's another "interface" like the pstorefs.)

So we need to provide the mapping back to the overlay. It feels to me
like the logic for this needs to live in the minidump driver itself
(rather than in the pstore RAM backend). Specifically, it wants to know
about all the operational frontends (dmesg, console, ftrace, pmsg) with
their virt & phys addresses and size.

The frontends are defined via enum pstore_type_id, and the other values
are "normal" types, so it should be possible to move this logic into
minidump instead, leaving a simpler callback. Perhaps something like:

void pstore_region_defined(enum pstore_type_id, void *virt,
			   phys_addr_t phys, size_t size);

How the pstore ram backend should know to call this, though, I'm
struggling to find a sensible way. How can it determine if the device
tree region is actually contained by a minidump overlay?

Do you think, if qcom_minidump_ready() can be used which checks minidump readiness ?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux