[PATCH] remoteproc: st: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
index a3268d95a50e..50ef40671652 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int st_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		clk_set_rate(ddata->clk, ddata->clk_rate);
 	}
 
-	if (of_get_property(np, "mbox-names", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(np, "mbox-names")) {
 		ddata->mbox_client_vq0.dev		= dev;
 		ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_done		= NULL;
 		ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_block	= false;
-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux