Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom_scm: Use fixed width src vm bitmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/14/2023 9:23 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 01:44:17PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Elliot Berman wrote:
The maximum VMID for assign_mem is 63. Use a u64 to represent this
bitmap instead of architecture-dependent "unsigned int" which varies in
size on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms.

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> (ath10k)
Tested-by: Gokul krishna Krishnakumar <quic_gokukris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

@Greg, would you mind taking this through your tree for v6.3, you
already have a related change in fastrpc.c in your tree...

I tried, but it doesn't apply to my char-misc tree at all:

checking file drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 898 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 915 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 930 (offset -7 lines).
checking file drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
checking file drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
checking file drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 227 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 404 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 939 with fuzz 1 (offset -28 lines).
checking file drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 94.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
checking file drivers/soc/qcom/rmtfs_mem.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 (offset -1 lines).
can't find file to patch at input line 167
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
|index 1e449a5d7f5c..250ea4efb7cb 100644
|--- a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
|+++ b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
--------------------------

What tree is this patch made against?


Sorry about that, I missed the previous changes in qcom_q6v5_pas in the
remoteproc tree. Elliot said he based it on linux-next, so I expect that
it will merge fine on top of -rc1, once that arrives.


Yes, this patch applies on next-20230213. I guess there are enough changes were coming from QCOM side (via Bjorn's qcom tree) as well as the fastrpc change (via Greg's char-misc tree).

Let me know if I should do anything once -rc1 arrives. Happy to post version on the -rc1 if it helps.

Thanks,
Elliot

Regards,
Bjorn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux