Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: core: change to ordered workqueue for crash handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/2022 1:34 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:45:32PM +0800, Maria Yu wrote:
Only the first detected crash needed to be handled, so change
to ordered workqueue to avoid unnecessary multi active work at
the same time. This will reduce the pm_relax unnecessary concurrency.

Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index c2d0af048c69..4b973eea10bb 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2728,8 +2728,8 @@ static void __exit rproc_exit_panic(void)
static int __init remoteproc_init(void)
  {
-	rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
-						WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
+	rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
+						WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);

There is an indentation issue with the second line and this patch doesn't
compile:

My Clang 14.0.7 didn't have such kind of compilation error.
what's your CC version pls? Maybe I can have a try to reproduce.

Anyway, I will double confirm if there is any difference with current patchset with my compile tested patchset as well.

   CC      drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.o
   AR      drivers/hwspinlock/built-in.a
In file included from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:15,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/ipc.h:7,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/sem.h:5,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/sched.h:15,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/delay.h:23,
                  from /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:19:
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c: In function ‘remoteproc_init’:
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2738:46: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
  2738 |  rproc_recovery_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("rproc_recovery_wq",
       |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/include/linux/workqueue.h:419:18: note: in definition of macro ‘alloc_ordered_workqueue’
   419 |  alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED |  \
       |                  ^~~

Last but not least, please use the get_maintainer.pl script to make sure the
right people are CC'ed on your patchsets.get_maintainer.pl will be re-run for next patchset uploading.
Thank you for reminder!

Thanks,
Mathieu

  	if (!rproc_recovery_wq) {
  		pr_err("remoteproc: creation of rproc_recovery_wq failed\n");
  		return -ENOMEM;
--
2.17.1



--
Thx and BRs,
Aiqun(Maria) Yu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux