Hi, On 9/15/2022 7:41 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The struct_size() macro protects against integer overflows but adding "+ rsc->config_len" introduces the risk of integer overflows again. Use size_add() to be safe. Fixes: c87846571587 ("remoteproc: use struct_size() helper") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index e5279ed9a8d7..4fc5ce2187ac 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -520,12 +520,13 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr; struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; + size_t rsc_size; int i, ret; char name[16];/* make sure resource isn't truncated */- if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len > - avail) { + rsc_size = struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings); + if (size_add(rsc_size, rsc->config_len) > avail) { dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n"); return -EINVAL;
Looks Good. Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx> -Mukesh
}
