Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-09-08 06:23:38)
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> index 02d17b4..207270d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static unsigned long adsp_panic(struct rproc *rproc)
> return qcom_q6v5_panic(&adsp->q6v5);
> }
>
> -static const struct rproc_ops adsp_ops = {
> +static struct rproc_ops adsp_ops = {
This is sad.
> .start = adsp_start,
> .stop = adsp_stop,
> .da_to_va = adsp_da_to_va,
> @@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (desc->has_iommu)
> + adsp_ops.parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
> +
Why not have two different set of ops so that the function pointer table
can't be hijacked? One for the parse_fw callback? Or simply return from
rproc_elf_load_rsc_table() when has_iommu is false?
> rproc = rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &adsp_ops,
