Hi,
I am fine with the patch but I need to understand who is "cgel.zte" - are we
talking about a person or an automated bot. In case of the former than an SoB
from that person needs to be on this patch. If an automated bot, than that
needs to be changed to someone accountable for the code that can put an SoB on
the patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:19:54AM +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Return the value rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add() directly instead of storing it
> in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index 4f2189111494..0850ae34fb88 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -424,15 +424,12 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> {
> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
> - int ret;
>
> eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent);
> if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
> return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
>
> - ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
