On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 09:40:36PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 20:43, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24/06/2022 19:36, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:41:20AM +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> >>>> rpmsg_register_device_override need to call put_device to free vch when
> >>>> driver_set_override fails.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by adding a put_device() to the error path.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: bb17d110cbf2 ("rpmsg: Fix calling device_lock() on non-initialized device")
> >>>
> >>> This is funny... Neither Bjorn nor I have reviewed this patch...
> >>
> >> It was a fix for commit in Greg's tree and Greg's pick it up after a
> >> week or something. I am not sure if that's actually funny that Greg has
> >> to pick it up without review :(
> >>
> >
> > The patch was sent out on April 19th and committed 3 days later on
> > April 22nd. Is 3 days the new patch review time standard?
>
> Neither 19th, nor 22nd are correct. The patch which you set you never
> reviewed, so commit bb17d110cbf2 was sent on 29th of April:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220429195946.1061725-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
Twitchy fingers... Those dates are for commit 42cd402b8fd4, which is referenced
by bb17d110cbf2.
The end result is the same, that is patches related to the remoteproc/rpmsg
subsystems (or any subsystem) should not be committed before their maintainers
have the opportunity to review them.
> And committed on 6 of May, which gives some time for review. Where did
> you see the other dates?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
