On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:29:45AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> > In preparation of the migration of the management of rvdev in
> > remoteproc_virtio.c, this patch spins off new functions to manage the
> > remoteproc virtio device.
> > - rproc_rvdev_add_device
> > - rproc_rvdev_remove_device
> >
> > The rproc_rvdev_add_device and rproc_rvdev_remove_device will be
> > moved to remoteproc_virtio.c.
> >
> > The rproc_vdev_data structure is introduced to provide information for
> > the rvdev creation. This structure allows to manage the rvdev and vrings
> > allocation in the rproc_rvdev_add_device function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 157 +++++++++++++----------
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 15 +++
> > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index c510125769b9..3a469220ac73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -484,74 +484,23 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
> > - * @rproc: the remote processor
> > - * @ptr: the vring resource descriptor
> > - * @offset: offset of the resource entry
> > - * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
> > - *
> > - * This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
> > - * device (vdev), and setup everything needed to support it. It contains
> > - * everything needed to make it possible: the virtio device id, virtio
> > - * device features, vrings information, virtio config space, etc...
> > - *
> > - * Before registering the vdev, the vrings are allocated from non-cacheable
> > - * physically contiguous memory. Currently we only support two vrings per
> > - * remote processor (temporary limitation). We might also want to consider
> > - * doing the vring allocation only later when ->find_vqs() is invoked, and
> > - * then release them upon ->del_vqs().
> > - *
> > - * Note: @da is currently not really handled correctly: we dynamically
> > - * allocate it using the DMA API, ignoring requested hard coded addresses,
> > - * and we don't take care of any required IOMMU programming. This is all
> > - * going to be taken care of when the generic iommu-based DMA API will be
> > - * merged. Meanwhile, statically-addressed iommu-based firmware images should
> > - * use RSC_DEVMEM resource entries to map their required @da to the physical
> > - * address of their base CMA region (ouch, hacky!).
> > - *
> > - * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
> > - */
> > -static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> > - int offset, int avail)
> > +static struct rproc_vdev *
> > +rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data)
> > {
> > - struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr;
> > - struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> > - int i, ret;
> > + struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = rvdev_data->rsc;
> > char name[16];
> > -
> > - /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
> > - if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len >
> > - avail) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
> > - if (rsc->reserved[0] || rsc->reserved[1]) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n",
> > - rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings);
> > -
> > - /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
> > - if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + int i, ret;
> >
> > rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!rvdev)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > kref_init(&rvdev->refcount);
> >
> > - rvdev->id = rsc->id;
> > + rvdev->id = rvdev_data->id;
> > rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> > - rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> > + rvdev->index = rvdev_data->index;
> >
> > /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
> > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> > @@ -563,7 +512,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> > ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> > if (ret) {
> > put_device(&rvdev->dev);
> > - return ret;
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > }
> >
> > ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent);
> > @@ -576,7 +525,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> > ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev,
> > dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
> > if (ret) {
> > - dev_warn(dev,
> > + dev_warn(&rvdev->dev,
> > "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n",
> > dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret));
> > }
> > @@ -589,7 +538,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> > }
> >
> > /* remember the resource offset*/
> > - rvdev->rsc_offset = offset;
> > + rvdev->rsc_offset = rvdev_data->rsc_offset;
> >
> > /* allocate the vring resources */
> > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> > @@ -605,21 +554,20 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> >
> > rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return rvdev;
> >
> > unwind_vring_allocations:
> > for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
> > free_rvdev:
> > device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > - return ret;
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > }
> >
> > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> > +static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> > {
> > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount);
> > - struct rproc_vring *rvring;
> > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> > + struct rproc_vring *rvring;
> > int id;
> >
> > for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) {
> > @@ -632,6 +580,83 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> > device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
> > + * @rproc: the remote processor
> > + * @ptr: the vring resource descriptor
> > + * @offset: offset of the resource entry
> > + * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
> > + *
> > + * This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
> > + * device (vdev), and setup everything needed to support it. It contains
> > + * everything needed to make it possible: the virtio device id, virtio
> > + * device features, vrings information, virtio config space, etc...
> > + *
> > + * Before registering the vdev, the vrings are allocated from non-cacheable
> > + * physically contiguous memory. Currently we only support two vrings per
> > + * remote processor (temporary limitation). We might also want to consider
> > + * doing the vring allocation only later when ->find_vqs() is invoked, and
> > + * then release them upon ->del_vqs().
> > + *
> > + * Note: @da is currently not really handled correctly: we dynamically
> > + * allocate it using the DMA API, ignoring requested hard coded addresses,
> > + * and we don't take care of any required IOMMU programming. This is all
> > + * going to be taken care of when the generic iommu-based DMA API will be
> > + * merged. Meanwhile, statically-addressed iommu-based firmware images should
> > + * use RSC_DEVMEM resource entries to map their required @da to the physical
> > + * address of their base CMA region (ouch, hacky!).
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
> > + */
> > +static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
> > + int offset, int avail)
> > +{
> > + struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr;
> > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> > + struct rproc_vdev_data rvdev_data;
> > +
> > + /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
> > + if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len >
> > + avail) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
> > + if (rsc->reserved[0] || rsc->reserved[1]) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n",
> > + rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings);
> > +
> > + /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
> > + if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rvdev_data.id = rsc->id;
> > + rvdev_data.index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> > + rvdev_data.rsc_offset = offset;
> > + rvdev_data.rsc = rsc;
> > +
> > + rvdev = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rproc, &rvdev_data);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rvdev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(rvdev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount);
> > +
> > + rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev);
I understand that rproc_rvdev_remove_device() is created to counter balance
rproc_rvdev_add_device() but in this case it doesn't provide much. Moreover it
is removed and rproc_vdev_release() renamed in patch 4, making that one more
complex than it should be. As such please leave rproc_vdev_release() unchanged.
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * rproc_handle_trace() - handle a shared trace buffer resource
> > * @rproc: the remote processor
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index 72d4d3d7d94d..99f2ff88079f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,21 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
> > struct rproc_mem_entry trace_mem;
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct rproc_vdev_data - remoteproc virtio device data
> > + * @rsc_offset: offset of the vdev's resource entry
> > + * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h)
> > + * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table
> > + * @rsc: pointer to the vdev resource entry. Valid onlyduring vdev init as the resource can
> > + * be cached by rproc.
> > + */
> > +struct rproc_vdev_data {
> > + u32 rsc_offset;
> > + unsigned int id;
> > + unsigned int index;
>
> rvdev->index is a u32 so rproc_vdev_data::index should also be a u32.
>
> With the above:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'll take that back to see how the above refactoring fans out.
I am done reviewing this set.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>
> > + struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
> > +};
> > +
> > /* from remoteproc_core.c */
> > void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
> > irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
