[PATCH] hwspinlock: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 33eeff94fc2a..1fb3a2550e29 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -94,11 +94,9 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * the module SYSSTATUS register
 	 */
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto runtime_err;
-	}
 
 	/* Determine number of locks */
 	i = readl(io_base + SYSSTATUS_OFFSET);
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux