Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>
>
> There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
> app on the DSP and we do not need a resource table.
>
> remoteproc core allows us having an optional rsc_table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index 2abee78df96e..987ab1add761 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -802,6 +802,14 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> dev_err(dev, "%s: failed (%d, err:%d)\n", __func__, vqid, err);
> }
>
> +static int imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = imx_dsp_rproc_prepare,
> .unprepare = imx_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
> @@ -809,7 +817,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> .stop = imx_dsp_rproc_stop,
> .kick = imx_dsp_rproc_kick,
> .load = imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments,
> - .parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table,
> + .parse_fw = imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw,
Applied.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> };
> --
> 2.27.0
>
