On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 6:50 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version, > in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that, > in the worst scenario, could lead to heap overflows. > > Also, address the following sparse warnings: > drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c:96:36: warning: using sizeof on a flexible structure > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/174 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> LGTM. Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c > index d221fc9d756d..22e2ffb91743 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c > @@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ static int sprd_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENODEV; > > sprd_hwlock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, > - sizeof(struct sprd_hwspinlock_dev) + > - SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM * sizeof(*lock), > + struct_size(sprd_hwlock, bank.lock, SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!sprd_hwlock) > return -ENOMEM; > -- > 2.27.0 > -- Baolin Wang
