> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:33:29AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > To i.MX8QXP/QM/ULP and i.MX7ULP, Mcore maybe out of control of Linux.
> > And in such case, no need clk, so make clk optional with has_clk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 7b2578177ea8..0e99a3ca6fbc
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > struct work_struct rproc_work;
> > struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> > void __iomem *rsc_table;
> > + bool has_clk;
>
> I am usually weary of bloating structures with flags. I suggest achieving the
> same functionality with a macro that compares priv->dcfg with the right
> imx_rproc_dcfg structure.
priv->dcfg is some kind fixed settings, however has_clk could be runtime changed,
because i.MX platform M-core support multiple booting method and it
could work w/o clk handled by Linux depending on some pre-configuration
such as moving M-core in an separate hardware partition.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> > };
> >
> > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] = { @@
> > -724,6 +725,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_clk_enable(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> > if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_NONE)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (!priv->has_clk)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n"); @@ -768,6 +772,7 @@ static
> > int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > priv->rproc = rproc;
> > priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> > priv->dev = dev;
> > + priv->has_clk = true;
> >
> > dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
> > priv->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
