Hello Mathieu, On 6/24/21 9:35 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good day Christoph, > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:43:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Hi remoteproc maintainers, >> >> did you make any progress to get remoteproc out of creating fake >> devices that fake their dma ops status and the abuse of >> dma_declare_coherent_memory in removeproc_virtio? I remember we had >> a discussion on this a long time ago, and there was an unfinished >> patchset to change the memory pool handling. What happened to all that? > > I believe the conversation and patchset you are referring to are pre-dating my > time in this subsystem. To make sure I am looking at the right thing, can you > (or anyone else) point me to that discussion and related patches? 2 references: 1)Previous discussion thread on the topic: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/AOKowLclCbOCKxyiJ71WeNyuAAj2q8EUtxrXbyky5E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ 2) My patchset related to the refactoring of remoteproc virtio which tries to address the point by creating a remoteproc platform driver and declaring a virtio subnode in the device tree remoteproc node. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/16/1817 No time yet on my side to come back on the patchset :( Regards, Arnaud > > Thanks, > Mathieu >
