On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 07:03:06PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> Refactor out the mailbox request and associated ping logic code
> from k3_r5_rproc_start() function into its own separate function
> so that it can be re-used in the soon to be added .attach() ops
> callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 2975393ebacd..e7e1ca71763e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -376,6 +376,44 @@ static inline int k3_r5_core_run(struct k3_r5_core *core)
> 0, PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT);
> }
>
> +static int k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + client->dev = dev;
> + client->tx_done = NULL;
> + client->rx_callback = k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback;
> + client->tx_block = false;
> + client->knows_txdone = false;
> +
> + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> + * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> + *
> + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
> + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
> + */
> + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code
> * execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run
> @@ -495,38 +533,14 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster;
> - struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
> struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> struct k3_r5_core *core;
> u32 boot_addr;
> int ret;
>
> - client->dev = dev;
> - client->tx_done = NULL;
> - client->rx_callback = k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback;
> - client->tx_block = false;
> - client->knows_txdone = false;
> -
> - kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> - if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> + ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> - * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> - *
> - * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
> - * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
> - */
> - ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
> - goto put_mbox;
> - }
>
> boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr;
> /* TODO: add boot_addr sanity checking */
> --
> 2.30.1
>
