On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:00:24AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> With commit 312c004d36ce ("[PATCH] driver core: replace "hotplug" by
> "uevent"") already in the tree over a decade, update the name of
> FW_ACTION defines to follow semantics, and reflect what the defines are
> really meant for, i.e. whether or not generate user space event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/iqs62x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/misc/lattice-ecp3-config.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell_rbu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
> drivers/tty/serial/ucc_uart.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/firmware.h | 4 ++--
> lib/test_firmware.c | 10 +++++-----
> sound/soc/codecs/wm8958-dsp2.c | 6 +++---
> 12 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index d5590c08db51..e2b559945c11 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ static int sdma_get_firmware(struct sdma_engine *sdma,
> int ret;
>
> ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE,
> - FW_ACTION_HOTPLUG, fw_name, sdma->dev,
> + FW_ACTION_UEVENT, fw_name, sdma->dev,
Naming is hard :)
I can take this after -rc1, but really, is it needed?
What problem does this renaming solve? Who is the current name
confusing?
thanks,
greg k-h
