hello Mathieu
On 4/21/21 7:52 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:44:52PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> To prepare the split of the code related to the control (ctrldev)
>> and the endpoint (eptdev) devices in 2 separate files:
>>
>> - Rename and export the functions in rpmsg_char.h.
>>
>> - Suppress the dependency with the rpmsg_ctrldev struct in the
>> rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev function.
>>
>> - The rpmsg class is provided as parameter in rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev,
>> because the class is associated to the control part.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 19 +++++++++------
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> index 2bebc9b2d163..b9df8dc4365f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> /*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021, STMicroelectronics
>> * Copyright (c) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
>> * Copyright (c) 2012, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> * Copyright (c) 2012, PetaLogix
>> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> #include <uapi/linux/rpmsg.h>
>>
>> +#include "rpmsg_char.h"
>> #include "rpmsg_internal.h"
>>
>> #define RPMSG_DEV_MAX (MINORMASK + 1)
>> @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ struct rpmsg_eptdev {
>> wait_queue_head_t readq;
>> };
>>
>> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>
> Shouldn't this be rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy()? I've been wondering about the
> flipping of destroy and eptdev... The same for rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev().
As the function is exported i prefered to follow name srtructure that is
commonly used: <module>_<action>_<object>
But it is not a rule, so please just tell me if you prefer that i rename the
functions rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_xxxx?
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> {
>> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
>>
>> @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev);
>>
>> static int rpmsg_ept_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *buf, int len,
>> void *priv, u32 addr)
>> @@ -280,7 +283,7 @@ static long rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>> if (cmd != RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - return rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(&eptdev->dev, NULL);
>> + return rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(&eptdev->dev, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_eptdev_fops = {
>> @@ -339,10 +342,9 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
>> kfree(eptdev);
>> }
>>
>> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>> - struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo, struct class *rpmsg_class)
>> {
>> - struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ctrldev->rpdev;
>> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
>> struct device *dev;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -362,7 +364,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>>
>> device_initialize(dev);
>> dev->class = rpmsg_class;
>> - dev->parent = &ctrldev->dev;
>> + dev->parent = parent;
>> dev->groups = rpmsg_eptdev_groups;
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, eptdev);
>>
>> @@ -405,6 +407,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev);
>>
>> static int rpmsg_ctrldev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> {
>> @@ -444,7 +447,7 @@ static long rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>> chinfo.src = eptinfo.src;
>> chinfo.dst = eptinfo.dst;
>>
>> - return rpmsg_eptdev_create(ctrldev, chinfo);
>> + return rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(ctrldev->rpdev, &ctrldev->dev, chinfo, rpmsg_class);
>> };
>>
>> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_ctrldev_fops = {
>> @@ -530,7 +533,7 @@ static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>> int ret;
>>
>> /* Destroy all endpoints */
>> - ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_eptdev_destroy);
>> + ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev);
>> if (ret)
>> dev_warn(&rpdev->dev, "failed to nuke endpoints: %d\n", ret);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..379d2ae2bee8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2021.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
>> +#define __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
>> +
>> +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR)
>> +/**
>> + * rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev() - register char device based on an endpoint
>> + * @rpdev: prepared rpdev to be used for creating endpoints
>> + * @parent: parent device
>> + * @chinfo: assiated endpoint channel information.
>> + *
>> + * This function create a new rpmsg char endpoint device to instantiate a new
>> + * endpoint based on chinfo information.
>> + */
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo, struct class *rpmsg_class);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev() - destroy created char device endpoint.
>> + * @data: private data associated to the endpoint device
>> + *
>> + * This function destroys a rpmsg char endpoint device created by the RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL
>> + * control.
>> + */
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data);
>> +
>> +#else /*IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
>> +
>> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo,
>> + struct class *rpmsg_class)
>> +{
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + /* This shouldn't be possible */
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /*IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
>> +
>> +#endif /*__RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__ */
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
