On 12/9/20 3:06 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Arnaud,
>
> On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 14:12 +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> From: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxx>
>>
>> Change stm32 remoteproc driver to not generate an error message
>> when device probe operation is deferred for the reset controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> index a180aeae9675..25c916782991 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> @@ -614,7 +614,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct
>> platform_device *pdev,
>>
>> ddata->rst = devm_reset_control_get_by_index(dev, 0);
>> if (IS_ERR(ddata->rst)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get mcu reset\n");
>> + if (PTR_ERR(ddata->rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get mcu reset\n");
>> +
>
> There is dev_err_probe() now that could be used here instead.
> It has the added benefit that it records the reason for the
> deferred probe.
Thanks for the advice, I will test it!
>
>> return PTR_ERR(ddata->rst);
>> }
>>
>
