On Thu 29 Oct 18:54 CDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote: > > On 10/26/2020 2:09 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Fri 02 Oct 21:05 CDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote: [..] > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h > > > index 4b6be7b..d83ebca 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/elf.h> > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > +#define MAX_NAME_LENGTH 16 > > This name is too generic. Why is it 16? > > I will update the name to MAX_SHDR_NAME_LEN. In our usecase we didn't > expect a length of the section name to exceed > 16 characters (MAX_REGION_NAME_LENGTH defined in qcom_minidump.h in patch > 03/04). It might change later if users > want to increase the size. What would you prefer the max name length for the > section header to be? > If you calculate the size of the region based on the strings I don't see why you need to limit it here - and you shouldn't use a bounded version of strcpy in this case either. I don't think this part of the code should truncate the strings, if we need to sanitize the strings make sure to do that when you populate the list. Thanks, Bjorn
