RE: [PATCH 02/13] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Subject: [PATCH 02/13] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()
> 
> Whether started at probe() time or thereafter from the command line, a
> remote processor needs to be shutdown before the final cleanup phases can
> happen.  Otherwise the system may be left in an unpredictable state where
> the remote processor is expecting the remoteproc core to be providing
> services when in fact it no longer exist.
> 
> Invariably calling rproc_shutdown() is fine since it will return immediately if
> the remote processor has already been switched off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index fb2632cbd2df..7d78c9a9d88f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2260,10 +2260,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	if (!rproc)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> -	/* if rproc is marked always-on, rproc_add() booted it */
>  	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
> -	if (rproc->auto_boot)
> -		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> +	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> 
>  	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
> --
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux