On 2020-07-16 01:10, Sibi Sankar wrote:
On 2020-07-14 22:48, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than the segment
size. This is achieved by replacing mask based tracking with size.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index feb70283b..c6ce032 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ struct q6v5 {
bool running;
bool dump_mba_loaded;
- unsigned long dump_segment_mask;
- unsigned long dump_complete_mask;
+ size_t current_dump_size;
+ size_t total_dump_size;
phys_addr_t mba_phys;
void *mba_region;
@@ -1203,7 +1203,6 @@ static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct rproc
*rproc,
{
int ret = 0;
struct q6v5 *qproc = rproc->priv;
- unsigned long mask = BIT((unsigned long)segment->priv);
int offset = segment->da - qproc->mpss_reloc;
void *ptr = NULL;
@@ -1229,10 +1228,10 @@ static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct
rproc *rproc,
memset(dest, 0xff, segment->size);
}
- qproc->dump_segment_mask |= mask;
+ qproc->current_dump_size += segment->size;
/* Reclaim mba after copying segments */
- if (qproc->dump_segment_mask == qproc->dump_complete_mask) {
+ if (qproc->current_dump_size == qproc->total_dump_size) {
if (qproc->dump_mba_loaded) {
/* Try to reset ownership back to Q6 */
q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mpss_perm,
@@ -1274,7 +1273,7 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
"Failed to reclaim mba buffer system may become unstable\n");
/* Reset Dump Segment Mask */
- qproc->dump_segment_mask = 0;
+ qproc->current_dump_size = 0;
qproc->running = true;
return 0;
@@ -1323,7 +1322,7 @@ static int
qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
ehdr = (struct elf32_hdr *)fw->data;
phdrs = (struct elf32_phdr *)(ehdr + 1);
- qproc->dump_complete_mask = 0;
+ qproc->total_dump_size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_phnum; i++) {
phdr = &phdrs[i];
@@ -1338,7 +1337,7 @@ static int
qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
if (ret)
break;
There is also no longer a need to carry the 'i' in:
ret = rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(rproc,
phdr->p_paddr,
phdr->p_memsz,
qcom_q6v5_dump_segment,
(void *)i);
I assume Rishabh will re-spin the
series today and this will be taken
care as well.
Hi Sibi,
I'll respin and add the fixes.
Thanks
- qproc->dump_complete_mask |= BIT(i);
+ qproc->total_dump_size += phdr->p_memsz;
}
release_firmware(fw);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
