Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Replace mask based tracking with size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-07-14 22:48, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than the segment
size. This is achieved by replacing mask based tracking with size.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index feb70283b..c6ce032 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ struct q6v5 {
 	bool running;

 	bool dump_mba_loaded;
-	unsigned long dump_segment_mask;
-	unsigned long dump_complete_mask;
+	size_t current_dump_size;
+	size_t total_dump_size;

 	phys_addr_t mba_phys;
 	void *mba_region;
@@ -1203,7 +1203,6 @@ static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct q6v5 *qproc = rproc->priv;
-	unsigned long mask = BIT((unsigned long)segment->priv);
 	int offset = segment->da - qproc->mpss_reloc;
 	void *ptr = NULL;

@@ -1229,10 +1228,10 @@ static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
 		memset(dest, 0xff, segment->size);
 	}

-	qproc->dump_segment_mask |= mask;
+	qproc->current_dump_size += segment->size;

 	/* Reclaim mba after copying segments */
-	if (qproc->dump_segment_mask == qproc->dump_complete_mask) {
+	if (qproc->current_dump_size == qproc->total_dump_size) {
 		if (qproc->dump_mba_loaded) {
 			/* Try to reset ownership back to Q6 */
 			q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mpss_perm,
@@ -1274,7 +1273,7 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 			"Failed to reclaim mba buffer system may become unstable\n");

 	/* Reset Dump Segment Mask */
-	qproc->dump_segment_mask = 0;
+	qproc->current_dump_size = 0;
 	qproc->running = true;

 	return 0;
@@ -1323,7 +1322,7 @@ static int qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,

 	ehdr = (struct elf32_hdr *)fw->data;
 	phdrs = (struct elf32_phdr *)(ehdr + 1);
-	qproc->dump_complete_mask = 0;
+	qproc->total_dump_size = 0;

 	for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_phnum; i++) {
 		phdr = &phdrs[i];
@@ -1338,7 +1337,7 @@ static int qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
 		if (ret)
 			break;

There is also no longer a need to carry the 'i' in:

ret = rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(rproc, phdr->p_paddr,
                                                        phdr->p_memsz,
qcom_q6v5_dump_segment,
                                                        (void *)i);

Mathieu,
Thanks for the review. Will pass in
NULL instead in the next re-spin.


-		qproc->dump_complete_mask |= BIT(i);
+		qproc->total_dump_size += phdr->p_memsz;
 	}

 	release_firmware(fw);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux