Hi Randy On 2/12/20 4:54 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, > > kernel-doc supports "..." as a function argument for varargs. > See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst: > > "If a function has a variable number of arguments, its description should > be written in kernel-doc notation as:: > > * @...: description" I missed it, thanks for pointing it out! Regards Arnaud > > > So the below could be done as: > > On 2/12/20 1:32 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 097f33e4f1f3..5f9a5812505c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_da_to_va); >> /** >> * rproc_find_carveout_by_name() - lookup the carveout region by a name >> * @rproc: handle of a remote processor >> - * @name,..: carveout name to find (standard printf format) >> + * @name: carveout name to find (standard printf format) > > * @name: carveout name to find > * @...: standard printf format of args to search for carveout name > > although I'm not so sure about the descriptions there. > >> * >> * Platform driver has the capability to register some pre-allacoted carveout >> * (physically contiguous memory regions) before rproc firmware loading and > > > thanks for the kernel-doc update. >