Quoting Chris Lew (2019-10-08 18:33:45) > If a channel is being rapidly restarted and the kobj release worker is > busy, there is a chance the the rpdev_release function will run after > the channel struct itself has been released. > > There should not be a need to decouple the channel from rpdev in the > rpdev release since that should only happen from the channel close > commands. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lew <clew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes tag? The whole thing sounds broken and probably is still racy in the face of SMP given that channel->rpdev is tested for "published" or not. Can you describe the race that you're closing more?
