Hi
Any further comments?
Fabien
On 08/03/2019 1:42 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 16:42, Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx> a écrit :
>> Implement this optional ops, called by hwspinlock core while spinning on
>> a lock, between two successive invocations of trylock().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
>> index 4418392..c8eacf4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> @@ -42,9 +43,15 @@ static void stm32_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> writel(STM32_MUTEX_COREID, lock_addr);
>> }
>>
>> +static void stm32_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + ndelay(50);
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct hwspinlock_ops stm32_hwspinlock_ops = {
>> .trylock = stm32_hwspinlock_trylock,
>> .unlock = stm32_hwspinlock_unlock,
>> + .relax = stm32_hwspinlock_relax,
>> };
>>
>> static int stm32_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
