Hi Yue, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-remoteproc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-remoteproc- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of YueHaibing > Sent: vendredi 1 février 2019 04:13 > To: ohad@xxxxxxxxxx; bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static > > Fixes the following sparse warnings: > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:279:5: warning: > symbol 'rproc_check_carveout_da' was not declared. Should it be static? Correction already sent on ML few weeks ago. See [1] Regards, Loic [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10755763/ > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 54ec38f..5d4954d 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, > const char *name, ...) > * > * Return: 0 if carveout match request else -ENOMEM > */ > -int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry > *mem, > - u32 da, u32 len) > +static int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem, > + u32 da, u32 len) > { > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > int delta = 0; > -- > 2.7.0 >
