On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:05:55AM +0000, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> On 12/18/18 9:16 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This is from static analysis and not from testing. It doesn't really
> > make sense to talk about !BIT(0) so probably ~BIT(0) was intended.
> > I had to cast it from unsigned long to unsigned int to silence a GCC
> > warning.
> >
> > Fixes: bb6869b21478 ("Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>")
And oh... I put Peter's email here instead of the commit title. Sorry.
I will resend if we decide the patch is required.
regards,
dan carpenter
