On 05/29/2018 10:30 AM, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adding my 'Tested-by'.
Normally you would say:
Tested-by: Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx>
The reason it might be important is you might wish to indicate the
name and/or e-mail as something different from what you're now
sending from.
Is what I wrote above the way you would like it to appear?
I will add that line to every one of my patches when I update them.
Thanks.
-Alex
>
> BR,
>
> Fabien
>
>
> On 29/05/18 17:26, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> Hi Fabien,
>> Please , could you add your "Tested-by" as you test it on ST platform?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Arnaud
>>
>> On 05/15/2018 10:53 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>>> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> On rare occasions a subdevice might need to prepare some hardware
>>> resources before a remote processor is booted, and clean up some
>>> state after it has been shut down.
>>>
>>> One such example is the IP Accelerator found in various Qualcomm
>>> platforms, which is accessed directly from both the modem remoteproc
>>> and the application subsystem and requires an intricate lockstep
>>> process when bringing the modem up and down.
>>>
>>> [elder@xxxxxxxxxx: minor description and comment edits]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tested-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx>
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>> index 2ede7ae6f5bc..283b258f5e0f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>> @@ -776,6 +776,30 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int rproc_prepare_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>>> + if (subdev->prepare) {
>>> + ret = subdev->prepare(subdev);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto unroll_preparation;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +unroll_preparation:
>>> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>>> + if (subdev->unprepare)
>>> + subdev->unprepare(subdev);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int rproc_start_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>>> {
>>> struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>>> @@ -810,6 +834,16 @@ static void rproc_stop_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void rproc_unprepare_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>>> + if (subdev->unprepare)
>>> + subdev->unprepare(subdev);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * rproc_coredump_cleanup() - clean up dump_segments list
>>> * @rproc: the remote processor handle
>>> @@ -902,11 +936,18 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>> rproc->table_ptr = loaded_table;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + ret = rproc_prepare_subdevices(rproc);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare subdevices for %s: %d\n",
>>> + rproc->name, ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> /* power up the remote processor */
>>> ret = rproc->ops->start(rproc);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "can't start rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + goto unprepare_subdevices;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Start any subdevices for the remote processor */
>>> @@ -914,8 +955,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>> if (ret) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to probe subdevices for %s: %d\n",
>>> rproc->name, ret);
>>> - rproc->ops->stop(rproc);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + goto stop_rproc;
>>> }
>>>
>>> rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;
>>> @@ -923,6 +963,14 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>> dev_info(dev, "remote processor %s is now up\n", rproc->name);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> +
>>> +stop_rproc:
>>> + rproc->ops->stop(rproc);
>>> +
>>> +unprepare_subdevices:
>>> + rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -1035,6 +1083,8 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc);
>>> +
>>> rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>>>
>>> dev_info(dev, "stopped remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>> index 8f1426330cca..e3c5d856b6da 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>> @@ -477,15 +477,19 @@ struct rproc {
>>> /**
>>> * struct rproc_subdev - subdevice tied to a remoteproc
>>> * @node: list node related to the rproc subdevs list
>>> + * @prepare: prepare function, called before the rproc is started
>>> * @start: start function, called after the rproc has been started
>>> * @stop: stop function, called before the rproc is stopped; the @crashed
>>> * parameter indicates if this originates from a recovery
>>> + * @unprepare: unprepare function, called after the rproc has been stopped
>>> */
>>> struct rproc_subdev {
>>> struct list_head node;
>>>
>>> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
>>> int (*start)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
>>> void (*stop)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed);
>>> + void (*unprepare)(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
>>> };
>>>
>>> /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
>>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
