On 01/31/2017 01:35 PM, Loic PALLARDY wrote: > Remoteproc doesn't check if firmware requests fixed > addresses for carveout regions. > Current assumption is that platform specific driver is in > charge of coprocessor specific memory region allocation and > remoteproc core doesn't have to handle them. > If a da or a pa is specified in firmware resource table, remoteproc > core doesn't have to perform any allocation. > Access to carveout will be done thanks to rproc_da_to_pa function, > which will provide virtual address on carveout region allocated > by platform specific driver. > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx> Acked-and-tested-by: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@xxxxxx> Tested on B2260 ST Platform with st-delta video decoder V4L2 kernel driver (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg107644.html). > --- > No change since V1 > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 90b05c7..dd63ceed 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -622,6 +622,11 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, > dev_dbg(dev, "carveout rsc: name: %s, da 0x%x, pa 0x%x, len 0x%x, flags 0x%x\n", > rsc->name, rsc->da, rsc->pa, rsc->len, rsc->flags); > > + if (rsc->pa != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY || rsc->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "carveout already allocated by low level driver\n"); > + return 0; > + } > + > carveout = kzalloc(sizeof(*carveout), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!carveout) > return -ENOMEM; > >��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ש����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
