Re: [PATCH for-next 00/12] RDMA/hns: Several fixes and cleanups of RQ/SRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:57:58PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> There are some issues when using SRQ on HIP08/HIP09, the first part of this
> series is some fixes on them.
> 
> In addition, the codes about RQ/SRQ including the creation and post recv
> flow are a bit hard to understand, they need to be refactored.
> 
> Lang Cheng (2):
>   RDMA/hns: Allocate one more recv SGE for HIP08
>   RDMA/hns: Use new interfaces to write SRQC
> 
> Wenpeng Liang (8):
>   RDMA/hns: Bugfix for checking whether the srq is full when post wr
>   RDMA/hns: Force srq_limit to 0 when creating SRQ
>   RDMA/hns: Fixed wrong judgments in the goto branch
>   RDMA/hns: Remove the reserved WQE of SRQ
>   RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_create_srq()
>   RDMA/hns: Refactor code about SRQ Context
>   RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_post_srq_recv()
>   RDMA/hns: Add verification of QP type when post_recv
> 
> Xi Wang (2):
>   RDMA/hns: Refactor post recv flow
>   RDMA/hns: Clear remaining unused sges when post_recv

Applied to for-next, thanks

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux