From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 12:23:48 +0000
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:12:11PM +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > pool_page_reusable() is a leftover from pre-NUMA-aware times. For now,
> > this function is just a redundant wrapper over page_is_pfmemalloc(),
> > so inline it into its sole call site.
>
> Why doesn't this want to use {dev_}page_is_reusable()?
Page Pool handles NUMA on its own. Replacing plain page_is_pfmemalloc()
with dev_page_is_reusable() will only add a completely redundant and
always-false check on the fastpath.
Al
