On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 14:31 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:49 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > From: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > MLX5_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES types bitfield is 64-bit field.
> >
> > Defining an enum for such bit fields on 32-bit platform results in
> > below
> > warning.
> >
> > ./include/vdso/bits.h:7:26: warning: left shift count >= width of
> > type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > ^
> > ./include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h:10716:46: note: in expansion of
> > macro ‘BIT’
> > MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_SAMPLER = BIT(0x20),
> > ^~~
> > Use 32-bit friendly left shift.
> >
> > Fixes: 2a2970891647 ("net/mlx5: Add sample offload hardware bits
> > and structures")
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> > b/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> > index 0d6e287d614f..b9f15935dfe5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> > @@ -10711,9 +10711,9 @@ struct
> > mlx5_ifc_affiliated_event_header_bits {
> > };
> >
> > enum {
> > - MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_ENCRYPTION_KEY =
> > BIT(0xc),
> > - MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_IPSEC = BIT(0x13),
> > - MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_SAMPLER = BIT(0x20),
> > + MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_ENCRYPTION_KEY = 1ULL <<
> > 0xc,
> > + MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_IPSEC = 1ULL << 0x13,
> > + MLX5_HCA_CAP_GENERAL_OBJECT_TYPES_SAMPLER = 1ULL << 0x20,
> > };
>
> Why not just use BIT_ULL?
I was following the file convention where we use 1ULL/1UL in all of the
places, I will consider changing the whole file to use BIT macros in
another patch.
