Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:49:46 +0000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201124094628.GI3159@unreal>
References: <20201123082400.351371-1-leon@kernel.org> <20201124093154.GA29715@infradead.org> <20201124094628.GI3159@unreal>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> No problem, I will reduce checkpatch limit from its default.

checkpatch unfortunately does not match what is documented in the
codingstyle document and leads to these kinds of problems :(

References:
- [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
  - From: Leon Romanovsky
- Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
  - From: Leon Romanovsky

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 1/5] verbs: Support dma-buf based memory region
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/mlx5: Use ib_dma APIs instead of open access to parent device
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 for-next] RDMA/hns: Create QP with selected QPN for bank load balance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux