Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] in_interrupt() cleanup, part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:54:39 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency across kernel configurations:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes
> behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so that
> e.g. task context invocations and BH invocations have different interfaces
> or if that's not possible the context information has to be provided by the
> caller which knows in which context it is executing.
> 
> This includes conditional locking, allocation mode (GFP_*) decisions and
> avoidance of code paths which might sleep.
> 
> In the long run, usage of 'preemptible, in_*irq etc.' should be banned from
> driver code completely.
> 
> This is part two addressing remaining drivers except for orinoco-usb.

Sebastian, thanks for there, I picked up only the Ethernet patches:

5ce7f3f46f6b net: neterion: s2io: Replace in_interrupt() for context detection
dc5e8bfcd12e net: forcedeth: Replace context and lock check with a lockdep_assert()
beca92820dc4 net: tlan: Replace in_irq() usage

Please repost the wireless stuff for Kalle to linux-wireless@vger, 
and repost the fsl stuff separately (our patchwork queue is huge, 
I can't keep this waiting for an ack any longer). 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux