> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 6:05 PM
> To: Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Vetter, Daniel
> <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] RDMA/umem: Support importing dma-buf as user memory region
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 12:57:21AM +0000, Xiong, Jianxin wrote:
> > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 5:28 PM
> > > To: Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> > > <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Christian
> > > Koenig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Vetter, Daniel
> > > <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] RDMA/umem: Support importing dma-buf as
> > > user memory region
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:02:45PM -0700, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> > > > +struct ib_umem *ib_umem_dmabuf_get(struct ib_device *device,
> > > > + unsigned long addr, size_t size,
> > > > + int dmabuf_fd, int access,
> > > > + const struct ib_umem_dmabuf_ops *ops) {
> > > > + struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > > > + struct ib_umem_dmabuf *umem_dmabuf;
> > > > + struct ib_umem *umem;
> > > > + unsigned long end;
> > > > + long ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (check_add_overflow(addr, (unsigned long)size, &end))
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (unlikely(PAGE_ALIGN(end) < PAGE_SIZE))
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (unlikely(!ops || !ops->invalidate || !ops->update))
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > +
> > > > + umem_dmabuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*umem_dmabuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!umem_dmabuf)
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > +
> > > > + umem_dmabuf->ops = ops;
> > > > + INIT_WORK(&umem_dmabuf->work, ib_umem_dmabuf_work);
> > > > +
> > > > + umem = &umem_dmabuf->umem;
> > > > + umem->ibdev = device;
> > > > + umem->length = size;
> > > > + umem->address = addr;
> > >
> > > addr here is offset within the dma buf, but this code does nothing with it.
> > >
> > The current code assumes 0 offset, and 'addr' is the nominal starting
> > address of the buffer. If this is to be changed to offset, then yes,
> > some more handling is needed as you mentioned below.
>
> There is no such thing as 'nominal starting address'
>
> If the user is to provide any argument it can only be offset and length.
>
> > > Also, dma_buf_map_attachment() does not do the correct dma mapping
> > > for RDMA, eg it does not use ib_dma_map(). This is not a problem for
> > > mlx5 but it is troublesome to put in the core code.
> >
> > ib_dma_map() uses dma_map_single(), GPU drivers use dma_map_resource()
> > for dma_buf_map_attachment(). They belong to the same family, but take
> > different address type (kernel address vs MMIO physical address).
> > Could you elaborate what the problem could be for non-mlx5 HCAs?
>
> They use the virtual dma ops which we intend to remove
We can have a check with the dma device before attaching the dma-buf and thus
ib_umem_dmabuf_get() call from such drivers would fail. Something like:
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_VIRT_OPS
if (device->dma_device->dma_ops == &dma_virt_ops)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
#endif
>
> Jason
