Re: Question about supporting RDMA Extensions for PMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/2020 4:13 AM, Li, Hao wrote:
Hi,

I have noticed that IETF has released a draft of RDMA Extensions for
PMEM [1]. Does libibverbs has a plan to implement these extensions? Are
there some good starting points if we want to participate the development.
Thanks!

[1]: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-talpey-rdma-commit-01.html

The draft you refer to is an individual draft, not an official IETF
release. However, after a lengthy process, the effort is now an official
work item of the NFSv4 working group, since the original STORM WG was
shut down an alternative process had to be determined.

An updated document is in the works, hopefully in October, and may
become a full RFC as the IETF process advances. My coauthors and I look
forward to this.

In the meantime, the IBTA LWG took up a similar task, and we completed
it several months ago. I am not sure when it might be released as an
official Annex, but I assume that is in the works as well. The IBTA
version of the extensions is semantically similar, but does not include
the "Verify" operation which in the iWARP document. Perhaps this will
be added later.

In theory, the IBTA SWG is in control of specifying any Verbs changes.
The Annex does discuss these, but SWG would still need to ratify. If
Fujitsu is an IBTA member, I'd encourage you to support this. IETF, of
course, has no dependency on IBTA, or Verbs, so participating there is
a separate matter. I encourage that participation, too!

Tom.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux