Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] RDMA/umem: Support importing dma-buf as user memory region

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 6:34 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:49:56PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > For reinstanting the pages you need:
> > >
> > > - dma_resv_lock, this prevents anyone else from issuing new moves or
> > >   anything like that
> > > - dma_resv_get_excl + dma_fence_wait to wait for any pending moves to
> > >   finish. gpus generally don't wait on the cpu, but block the dependent
> > >   dma operations from being scheduled until that fence fired. But for rdma
> > >   odp I think you need the cpu wait in your worker here.
> >
> > Reinstating is not really any different that the first insertion, so
> > then all this should be needed in every case?
>
> Yes. Without move_notify we pin the dma-buf into system memory, so it
> can't move, and hence you also don't have to chase it. But with
> move_notify this all becomes possible.

I just realized I got it wrong compared to gpus. I needs to be:
1. dma_resv_lock
2. dma_buf_map_attachment, which might have to move the buffer around
again if you're unlucky
3. wait for the exclusive fence
4. put sgt into your rdma ptes
5 dma_resv_unlock

Maybe also something we should document somewhere for dynamic buffers.
Assuming I got it right this time around ... Christian?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux