Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> >
> > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> no one could strongly object or review it :(

It took me time to realize why I was alone expressing my thoughts :).

BTW, I'm looking on ALSA thread and happy to see that people didn't like
"ancillary" name. It is far from intuitive name for any non-English speaker.

Thanks

>
> greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux