Re: [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 11:27:43AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 4:44 PM
>
> [..]
> > > > ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0b.0/mlx5_core.eth.2
> > > This gives you the ability to not load the netdevice and rdma device of a VF
> > and only load the vdpa device.
> > > These are real use case that users have asked for.
> > > In use case one, they are only interested in rdma device.
> > > In second use case only vdpa device.
> > > How shall one achieve that without spinning of the device for each class?
> >
> > Why will it be different if ancillary device is small PCI core?
> > If you want RDMA, you will use specific ancillary driver that connects to that
> > small PCI logic.
>
> I didn't follow, wwhat is PCI core and PCI logic in this context?

mlx5_core is PCI core/logic - ancillary device
mlx5_ib/mlx5_en/mlx5_vdpa - ancillary drivers

>
> Not sure if you understood the use case.
> Let me try again.
> Let say there are 4 VFs enabled.
> User would not like to create netdev for 3 VFs (0 to 2) ; user only wants rdma device for these VFs 0 to 2.
> User wants only vdpa device for 4th VF.
> User doesn't want to create rdma device and netdevice for the 4th VF.
> How one shall achieve this?

It depends on how N-to-1 bus will be implemented. For example, devlink
already allows to disable RoCE on specific function, nothing prohibits
to extend it to support other classes.

> It is easily achievable with current ancillary device instantiation per class proposal.

It is byproduct of 1-to-1 connection and not specific design decision.

>
> > Being nice to the users and provide clean abstraction are important goals too.
> Which part of this makes not_nice_to_users and what is not abstracted.
> I lost you.

Your use case perfectly presented not_nice_to_users thing. Users are
interested to work on functions (VF/PF/SF) and configure them without
need to dig into the sysfs directories to connect ancillary classes
and their indexes to the real functions.

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux