On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
>> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we have inside our ASIC.
>> The RDMA implementation we did does NOT support some basic RDMA
>> IBverbs (such as MR and PD) and therefore, we can't use the rdma-core
>> library or to connect to the rdma infrastructure in the kernel.
>
> You can't create a parallel RDMA subsystem in netdev, or in misc, and
> you can't add random device offloads as IOCTL to nedevs.
>
> RDMA is the proper home for all the networking offloads that don't fit
> into netdev.
>
> EFA was able to fit into rdma-core/etc and it isn't even RoCE at
> all. I'm sure this can too.
Well, EFA wasn't welcomed to the RDMA subsystem with open arms ;), initially it
was suggested to go through the vfio subsystem instead.
I think this comes back to the discussion we had when EFA was upstreamed, which
is what's the bar to get accepted to the RDMA subsystem.
IIRC, what we eventually agreed on is having a userspace rdma-core provider and
ibv_{ud,rc}_pingpong working (or just supporting one of the IB spec's QP types?).
Does GAUDI fit these requirements? If not, should it be in a different subsystem
or should we open the "what qualifies as an RDMA device" question again?
