On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:44:21PM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > ocrdma_qp_state_change() returns 1 when new and old state are the same, > however caller is checking using <0 > > Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@xxxxxxxxx> > drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_verbs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_verbs.c > index c1751c9a0f62..518687c5e2cb 100644 > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_verbs.c > @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ int _ocrdma_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_qp_attr *attr, > /* if new and previous states are same hw doesn't need to > * know about it. > */ > - if (status < 0) > + if (status == 1) > return status; > return ocrdma_mbx_modify_qp(dev, qp, attr, attr_mask); I'm not comfortable with this patch unless someone from Broadcom approves it. Skipping the modify_qp just because the state is the same looks wrong to me in the first place, I would rather see the dead code removed as a no-change patch. Jason
