Re: [PATCH 1/2] IB/isert: use unlikely macro in the fast path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I reviewed this patch and didn't find any justification for performance
claim, can you please provide us numbers before/after so we will be able
to decide based on reliable data? It will help us to review our drivers
and improve them even more.

I don't see any reason to find evidence in justification here. It's a
fastpath call, which is unlikely to fail, and these macros are
considered common practice.

There is no reason to make Max to go and quantify a micro-optimization.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux