Re: [PATCH for-next v4 3/4] RDMA/efa: User/kernel compatibility handshake mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:03:11PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> Introduce a mechanism that performs an handshake between the userspace
> provider and kernel driver which verifies that the user supports all
> required features in order to operate correctly.
> 
> The handshake verifies the needed functionality by comparing the
> reported device caps and the provider caps. If the device reports a
> non-zero capability the appropriate comp mask is required from the
> userspace provider in order to allocate the context.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Shadi Ammouri <sammouri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Yossi Leybovich <sleybo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/rdma/efa-abi.h           | 10 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c
> index 26102ab333b2..fda175836fb6 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c
> @@ -1501,11 +1501,39 @@ static int efa_dealloc_uar(struct efa_dev *dev, u16 uarn)
>  	return efa_com_dealloc_uar(&dev->edev, &params);
>  }
>  
> +#define EFA_CHECK_USER_COMP(_dev, _comp_mask, _attr, _mask, _attr_str) \
> +	(_attr_str = (!(_dev)->dev_attr._attr || ((_comp_mask) & (_mask))) ? \
> +		     NULL : #_attr)
> +
> +static int efa_user_comp_handshake(const struct ib_ucontext *ibucontext,
> +				   const struct efa_ibv_alloc_ucontext_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct efa_dev *dev = to_edev(ibucontext->device);
> +	char *attr_str;
> +
> +	if (EFA_CHECK_USER_COMP(dev, cmd->comp_mask, max_tx_batch,
> +				EFA_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_CMD_COMP_TX_BATCH, attr_str))
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (EFA_CHECK_USER_COMP(dev, cmd->comp_mask, min_sq_depth,
> +				EFA_ALLOC_UCONTEXT_CMD_COMP_MIN_SQ_WR,
> +				attr_str))
> +		goto err;

But this patch should be first, the kernel should never return a
non-zero value unless these input bits are set

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux