Am 21.07.20 um 08:05 schrieb Leon Romanovsky:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:34:00PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
Am 20.07.20 um 18:48 schrieb Leon Romanovsky:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 08:36:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:07:16 +0300
Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do *you* want to review that megapatch? The number of issues that have
This question is... interesting.
And no, I would not.
You are EXPECTED to review your work prior sending to the mailing list.
I meant I wouldn't review *one big* patch.
I didn't mean my actually sent smaller ones.
come up make it clear that these patches do, indeed, need review...
Can you point me to the issues?
What can go wrong with such a simple replacement?
Some bits of the conversation:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200626110219.7ae21265@xxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@xxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200705142506.1f26a7e0@xxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200713114321.783f0ae6@xxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202007081531.085533FC5@keescook/
etc.
After reading your links and especially this one.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200713114321.783f0ae6@xxxxxxx/
I don't understand why are we still seeing these patches?
I gave to the author comments too, which were ignored.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11644683/#23466547
I've added SPDXing (the automated way of course ;) ) to my todo list.
OMG, why don't you listen? We don't want your automatic patches.
Wrong.
*Some of you* don't want my automatic patches.
And *some others* already applied them and said thanks.
Thanks
Thanks
jon
