Re: Question about IB_QP_CUR_STATE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:42:34PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 12:41, liweihang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm a little confused about the role of IB_QP_CUR_STATE in the enumeration
> > ib_qp_attr_mask.
> >
> > In manual page of ibv_modify_qp(), comments of cur_qp_state is "Assume this
> > is the current QP state". Why we need to get current qp state from users
> > instead of drivers?
> >
> > For example, why the users are allowed to modify qp from RTR to RTS again
> > even if the qp's state in driver and hardware has already been RTS.
> >
> > I would be appretiate it if someone can help with this.
> >
> > Weihang
> >
>
> Talking about IB_QP_CUR_STATE, I see many drivers filling it in their query QP
> callback although it should only be used in modify operations.. Is there a
> reason not to remove it?

IBTA section "11.2.5.3 QUERY QUEUE PAIR" has line about IB_QP_CUR_STATE.
It is one of output modifiers.

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux