On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:07:51AM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:53:42AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:21:25AM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:26:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:50:24PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Current device ops implementation allows only two stages "set"/"not set"
> > > > > and requires caller to check if function pointer exists before
> > > > > calling it.
> > > > >
> > > > > In order to simplify this repetitive task, let's give an option to
> > > > > overwrite those pointers. This will allow us to set dummy functions
> > > > > for the specific function pointers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 9 ++++-----
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > > index d9f565a779df..9486e60b42cc 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > > @@ -2542,11 +2542,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_net_dev_by_params);
> > > > > void ib_set_device_ops(struct ib_device *dev, const struct ib_device_ops *ops)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct ib_device_ops *dev_ops = &dev->ops;
> > > > > -#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name) \
> > > > > - do { \
> > > > > - if (ops->name) \
> > > > > - if (!((ptr)->name)) \
> > > > > - (ptr)->name = ops->name; \
> > > > > +#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name) \
> > > > > + do { \
> > > > > + if (ops->name) \
> > > > > + (ptr)->name = ops->name; \
> > > > > } while (0)
> > > >
> > > > Did you carefully check every driver to be sure it is OK with this?
> > > >
> > > > Maybe Kamal remembers why it was like this?
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > >
> > > The idea was to set a specific op only once by the provider when there
> > > is a valid function for the op, this was done to make sure that if
> > > the op isn't supported by the provider then it will be set to NULL.
> >
> > This is not changed.
> >
>
> Well, This is changed in patch #6 as dummy functions are now allowed...,
> Instead of setting NULL when the op isn't supported by the provider.
>From provider point of view nothing is changed, if it is not supported,
the ops won't be set. Everything will be handled in the IB/core exactly
like we do in the rdma-core.
>
> I'm wondering why allow only fill_res_entry() and fill_stat_entry() to
> be a dummy function as there is multiple ops that can be dummy too,
> and why this has to be in this patch set instead in a seperiate patch
> set for all the ops that can be dummy?
We started from fill_res_entry() as a perfect example of code
duplication and primary beneficiary of this approach. Inside nldev.c, we
want to be able to call function without need to check that function
pointer exists.
But let's drop this change. It is not important for main feature
implemented in this patch set.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Kamal
>
> > >
> > > I think it will be more cleaner from the provider point of view to
> > > see which ops are supported or not supported in the provider code. by
> > > overriding the ops in the core this will make things more confusing.
> >
> > Actually the patch does quite opposite, set defaults by IB/core and
> > overwrite it by the provider later and not vice versa. The IB/core
> > won't overwrite defined by the provider ops. From provider point of view
> > no change.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kamal
