On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:23:01PM +0300, Yamin Friedman wrote:
>
> On 5/20/2020 9:19 AM, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > +
> > > +static int ib_alloc_cqs(struct ib_device *dev, int nr_cqes,
> > > + enum ib_poll_context poll_ctx)
> > > +{
> > > + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
> > > + struct ib_cq *cq;
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > + int nr_cqs, ret, i;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Allocated at least as many CQEs as requested, and otherwise
> > > + * a reasonable batch size so that we can share CQs between
> > > + * multiple users instead of allocating a larger number of CQs.
> > > + */
> > > + nr_cqes = min(dev->attrs.max_cqe, max(nr_cqes, IB_MAX_SHARED_CQ_SZ));
> > > + nr_cqs = min_t(int, dev->num_comp_vectors, num_online_cpus());
> > No WARN() or return with failure as pointed by Leon and me. Has
> > anything else changes elsewhere?
>
> Hey Devesh,
>
> I am not sure what you are referring to, could you please clarify?
He is saying that dev->num_comp_vectors can be 0.
Thanks
