On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:50:45PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:45:36PM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:21:32PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:02:04PM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:22:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:29:18AM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote: > > > > > > Avoid disabling device management for devices that don't support > > > > > > Management datagrams (MADs) by checking if the "mad_agent" pointer is > > > > > > initialized before calling ib_modify_port, also change the error message > > > > > > to a warning and make it more informative. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 09f8a1486dca ("RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of SR-IOV and iWARP ports") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 8 ++++++-- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c > > > > > > index 7ed38d1cb997..7b21792ab6f7 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c > > > > > > @@ -625,14 +625,18 @@ static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev) > > > > > > .clr_port_cap_mask = IB_PORT_DEVICE_MGMT_SUP, > > > > > > }; > > > > > > struct srpt_port *sport; > > > > > > + int ret; > > > > > > int i; > > > > > > > > > > > > for (i = 1; i <= sdev->device->phys_port_cnt; i++) { > > > > > > sport = &sdev->port[i - 1]; > > > > > > WARN_ON(sport->port != i); > > > > > > - if (ib_modify_port(sdev->device, i, 0, &port_modify) < 0) > > > > > > - pr_err("disabling MAD processing failed.\n"); > > > > > > if (sport->mad_agent) { > > > > > > + ret = ib_modify_port(sdev->device, i, 0, &port_modify); > > > > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > > > > + pr_warn("%s-%d: disabling device management failed (%d). Note: this is expected if SR-IOV is enabled.\n", > > > > > > + dev_name(&sport->sdev->device->dev), > > > > > > > > > > The ib_modify_port() shouldn't be called if it expected to fail. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > OK, Do you know if there is a way to check if the created ib device is > > > > for VF to avoid calling ib_modify_port()? > > > > > > The "is_virtfn" field inside pci_dev will give this information, > > > but I don't know why it is expected to fail here. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Looks like there a more trivial way, I mean checking if > > IB_DEVICE_VIRTUAL_FUNCTION cap is set, probably there is a need to make > > to sure that this cap is set for all providers when the IB device is > > created for a VF. > > > > With regards to why it is expected to fail, as stated in the commit > > message and the in "Fixes" commit message there is some devices (VF) > > that don't support MADs. > > So shouldn't you test that device support MAD instead of testing VF cap? > > Thanks Correct me if I'm wrong, Do you mean check the return value from rdma_cap_ib_mad()? Thanks, Kamal > > > > > Thanks, > > Kamal > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kamal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + sport->port, ret); > > > > > > ib_unregister_mad_agent(sport->mad_agent); > > > > > > sport->mad_agent = NULL; > > > > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.25.4 > > > > > >