On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:58:38PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:30:09AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > + flow_act->action &= > > + ~MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_NEXT_PRIO; > > + flow_act->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST; > > + handle = _mlx5_add_flow_rules(ft, spec, flow_act, dest, num_dest); > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle)) > > + goto unlock; > > I never like seeing IS_ERR_OR_NULL().. > > In this case I see callers of mlx5_add_flow_rules() that crash if it > returns NULL, so this can't be right. > > Also, I don't see an obvious place where _mlx5_add_flow_rules() > returns NULL, does it? You are right, I'll replace this IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to be IS_ERR() once will take it to mlx5-next. Is it ok? Thanks > > Jason
