Re: [PATCH v3 for-next 1/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize PBL buffer allocation process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/4/28 10:53, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Weihang,
> 
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on rdma/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.7-rc3 next-20200424]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Weihang-Li/RDMA-hns-Refactor-process-of-buffer-allocation-and-calculation/20200428-015905
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.1-191-gc51a0382-dirty
>         make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
>         make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> 
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c:375:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'hns_roce_mr_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

It will be used out of this file in later series, but it's better to add
a static currently. Will fix it, thanks.

Weihang




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux